6800 vs 6800 xt benchmark

I’ve also used AMD’s versions of the RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT, as these were the cards I used for my respective GPU reviews. 16GB of VRAM is a key feature of the 6800 cards. However, this situation will likely change once AMD launch their upcoming DLSS competitor tech, FidelityFX Super Resolution - although whether it will be as good at boosting each card's performance as Nvidia's DLSS tech remains to be seen. 6800-XT 9600K Source. It still has around a 10fps lead on its non-XT sibling here, sometimes reaching closer to 15-20fps, but with high refresh rate monitors still being relatively scarce at 4K, you’re more likely to hit the 60fps threshold on both cards here, negating that extra lead offered by the XT. Of course, you could say the same about the RX 6800 XT’s speeds on High quality settings, and there is some truth in that. I might just about be able to distinguish between 105fps and close to 130fps in something like The Witcher III, for example, but 80-90fps is all much of a muchness to my eyes. For the most part, though, there’s a clear gap between these two cards, with the RX 6800 XT leading by around 10-15fps depending on the title. I’ve also kept ray tracing switched off for this particular comparison test, as I’ll be taking a closer look at next-gen ray tracing performance across all of the new AMD and Nvidia GPUs in a dedicated comparison piece. In Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, for example, the RX 6800 hit a low of 42fps in its built-in benchmark versus the 6800 XT’s low of 49fps, while Final Fantasy XV saw the RX 6800 hit lows of 48fps, which is almost 10fps below the RX 6800 XT’s low of 56fps. Of course, that’s hardly surprising given how expensive they are, and in most cases the RX 6800 XT has a decent lead on its non-XT sibling. We conducted our tests on the same $550, 144Hz Nixeus EDG34S monitor as … Naturally, the RX 6800 XT’s faster frame rates do come in handy when you start throwing ray tracing into the mix, especially if you want to play games at 1440p. I’ll be comparing AMD’s new RX 6000 cards to Nvidia’s RTX 30 series in a separate article, but for now I wanted to focus on how AMD’s new cards compare, and whether the £620 / $650 RX 6800 XT is really worth all that extra money over the £530 / $580 RX 6800. Benchmark Results of the AMD 6800 XT vs RTX 3080Subscribe for all the latest trailers and gameplay: http://goo.gl/8LO96FBecome a member! 16GB of VRAM is a key feature of the 6800 cards. If you’re aiming to play games at 4K, however, then you’re definitely going to get a lot more out of the RX 6800 XT. VS Watch Gameplay. Overgrowth developer felt he "had no choice" in filing antitrust suit against Valve, Alleges Valve make it impossible for stores to compete on price, IGF's 2021 nominees announced, mostly correct, Teardown, Paradise Killer and Spiritfarer up for top prize, Slipways' open beta offers a pocket-sized grand strategy campaign, We've been talking, and we think that you should wear clothes, Total coincidence, but we sell some clothes. The performance of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT is comparable to a Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080. How to Start an Online Business in 2021: Your Go-To Jumpstart Guide, Call of Duty Cold War system requirements: minimum and recommended PC specs, Assassin’s Creed Valhalla: how to get the best performance on PC, This LG 1440p G-Sync Compatible monitor is £100 off right now, Nvidia tried to bury this… Radeon 6000 (RIP RTX 3090), Tales From The Borderlands returns to digital stores next week, Slipways was the best demo in the Steam Games Festival, Forza Horizon 4 will launch on Steam in March, The Architect: Paris is a different kind of citybuilder, Beat Saber, the best VR game, has sold 4 million copies, Protect your web apps and APIs against threats and fraud with Google Cloud, eBPF for Advanced Linux Infrastructure Monitoring, Best Open Source LMS for Creating Online Course and e-Learning Websites, Multicollab Plugin Adds Google Doc-Style Commenting to Gutenberg Blocks. But how do they compare performance-wise and which one should you consider buying when they finally come back in stock? At 1080p and 1440p, I’m just not convinced you’re going to notice the extra performance offered by the XT at these resolutions, at least not when it comes to raw performance. All contend is copyright by the directly related news source. Please see our code of conduct, where you can find out what "be excellent" means. In terms of the GPU architecture, both the RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT are equipped with AMD RDNA2 7nm GPUs, the same GPU architecture used in latest PS5 and X series X. Our main commenting rule is "be excellent to each other". Ende 2020 sorgte AMD mit der Radeon RX 6800, 6800 XT … To test the RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT, I paired them with my usual Intel Core i5-10600K processor and 16GB of Corsair Vengeance LED RAM, and put them head to head in my suite of graphics benchmarks, taking an average frame rate from their own built-in benchmark tools or from my own repeatable manual gameplay tests. The RX 6800 XT gives it a pretty good shot, hitting 60fps in pretty much everything but two games on max settings, but there are still cases where it falls down closer to the 40-50fps mark, such as in Total War: Three Kingdoms and Monster Hunter: World. However, as I said above, if playing games as close to 60fps is important to you, then the RX 6800 XT is much more likely to achieve those kinds of frame rates on High than the non-XT version. As I said in my RX 6800 XT review, the RTX 3080 is clearly the superior card at 4K, and you can read more about its 4K performance in my RTX 3080 vs 2080 and 2080 Super comparison article. Again, there are exceptions to this rule. GPU Architecture. The RX 6900-XT assumes the flagship position in AMD’s latest RX 6000 series of GPUs which deliver a huge generational jump in performance. I'll be comparing AMD's new RX 6000 cards to Nvidia's RTX 30 series in a separate article, but for now I wanted to focus on how AMD's new cards compare, and whether the £620 / $650 RX 6800 XT is really worth all that extra money over the £530 / $580 RX 6800. For the most part, though, there's a clear gap between these two cards, with the RX 6800 XT leading by around 10-15fps depending on the title. The 6800 XT trails the 6900 XT in performance but still manages to deliver a gaming experience that is in the vicinity of the more powerful cards. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC White: 13. It's not a huge improvement, though. The RX 6800 (top) is exactly the same size as the RX 6800 XT (below), just a bit thinner. The RX 6800 XT, on the other hand, might still struggle to hit 60fps at 1440p with maxed out ray tracing, but its smoother 55fps average frame rates are still pretty darn close. RX 6800 XT vs RTX 3080 Comparison. Indeed, even if you do own a high refresh rate monitor that goes above 60Hz, I’m not sure I’d be able to tell the difference between 80 and 90fps without the aid of a frame rate counter. Recently, AMD launched their new Radeon RX 6800 and 6800 XT GPUs and while supply has been especially tight, we have finally managed to get our hands on a pair of cards courtesy of our friend Brian Stroh at BPS Customs.AMD has advertised very large performance gains with these cards, although gaming has been AMD's focus for the Radeon series of cards for the last few … ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 6800 XT OC vs MSI Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming X Trio 16G: 10. Admittedly, neither card is really fit for 60fps on max settings at this resolution, as you can see from the bar chart below. Whack the quality down to Medium, however, and the XT’s performance bump starts to become less obvious again. In Final Fantasy XV, I only saw a difference of around 5fps between each card, for example, and Control was even closer at just 3fps. AMD’s two RX 6000 cards are still highly capable in this department, though, with the RX 6800 hitting at last 75-80fps in today’s big blockbusters, while the RX 6800 XT is hitting at least 90fps. Radeon RX 6800 XT is built on the RDNA 2 architecture on the TSMC 7nm manufacturing process. The games include a mix of blockbusters from the last couple of years: Shadow Of The Tomb Raider, Total War: Three Kingdoms, Final Fantasy XV, Monster Hunter: World, Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, The Witcher 3, Metro Exodus and Control. Sign up today and get access to more articles like these, an ad-free reading experience, free gifts, and help us create more great writing about PC games. Control once again saw a nigh-on identical average frame rate from both cards – although the RX 6800 XT does pull ahead when you switch on the game’s ray tracing support. As I mentioned right at the top of this article, I’ll be doing a separate ray tracing comparison piece with all of today’s next-gen graphics cards very soon, so watch out for that to get a better idea of how things stack up. We not guarrantee the accouracy of any of the external content feeds. AMD 6800-XT $650. Stutters & Frame Drops. The RX 6800-XT delivers a huge generational jump in performance. Admittedly, both the RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT are sold out almost everywhere at the moment, making them as difficult to buy as Nvidia’s equally new RTX 30 series. The release of the RX 6800 explains why Nvidia doubled performance per dollar with their 3000 series release just a few weeks ago. When it comes to 1440p, it leads by anywhere between 2 FPS (Battlefield V) to 15 FPS (Wolfenstein Youngblood), while both GPUs trading blows with the Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 3000 series counterparts. At the 3840 x 2160 resolution, the RX Radeon 6900 XT leads the RX Radeon 6800 XT at framerates ranging from 5 FPS (The Division 2) to 12 FPS (Doom Eternal). The RX 6800 XT also struggles with Control on max settings (although given its max settings are technically called ‘High’, I’ve included them in the chart below to avoid confusion). In truth, you're probably also better off going with Nvidia's RTX 3070 instead of the regular RX 6800 for 4K gaming as well, as their respective speeds are both much of a muchness. Respect others, think before you post, and be prepared for puns. I ran both cards at their default clock speeds as well, so the figures below should be pretty representative of what you’ll find on other types of RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT cards made by third party manufacturers. It’s a similar picture across other games, too, with the RX 6800 dipping much lower than the XT. AMD Radeon RX 6800 and 6800 XT 3440x1440 ultrawide benchmarks Brad Chacos/IDG. As such, you'll likely see better performance from the RX 6800 XT at 1080p if you pair it with a more powerful processor, such as one of Intel's Core i7s or AMD's Ryzen 7 chips. ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 6800 XT OC vs EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper Gaming: 12. That said, there are a couple of games where the RX 6800 isn't that far behind the RX 6800 XT. Indeed, until AMD’s FidelityFX Super Resolution tech comes out, you shouldn’t really be buying either RX 6000 card for 4K gaming at the moment, as their raw performance just can’t compete with what you get with Nvidia’s RTX cards with DLSS turned on (although again I’ll be doing more in-depth benchmark comparisons between AMD and Nvidia’s new cards very soon). Needless to say, ray tracing at 4K is pretty much out of the question on these cards right now, but even if you’re just looking to buy a 4K card in general, I’d probably still side with the RX 6800 here, if only because once you start hitting the £600 / $650 mark, you might as well opt for Nvidia’s RTX 3080 rather than AMD’s RX 6800 XT at this resolution. A comparison between Nvidia’s previous generation flagship, the 2080 Ti, and the 6800-XT shows that AMD now offer comparable raw performance at half the price. When you’re dealing with powerful graphics cards like this at 1920×1080, any potential bottlenecks are almost certainly going to be related to your CPU rather than your GPU at this resolution, and it can make a surprising amount of difference to your PC’s overall performance. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC White vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT: 11. No part of this site or its content may be reproduced without the permission of the copyright holder. Clearly, neither the RX 6800 or RX 6800 are going to struggle playing games at 1920×1080 for the foreseeable future, as even the RX 6800 is capable of hitting at least 100fps on max settings here, while the RX 6800 XT is often pushing 120fps. The RX 6800-XT delivers a huge generational jump in performance. Elsewhere on High settings, however, the RX 6800 XT does put in quite an impressive performance over its non-XT sibling. BenQ's Zowie XL2546K is a 240Hz monitor with an ultra premium price, It's all down to its special anti-motion blur tech, I'm slowly becoming obsessed with video game book shelves. Of course, unless you own a high refresh rate monitor, opting for the RX 6800 XT won’t get you any benefit at all, as monitors with a standard 60Hz refresh rate will display the same 60fps regardless of which card’s inside your PC. The RX 6800 XT, on the other hand, might still struggle to hit 60fps at 1440p with maxed out ray tracing, but its smoother 55fps average frame rates are still pretty darn close. 9600K. The games include a mix of blockbusters from the last couple of years: Shadow Of The Tomb Raider, Total War: Three Kingdoms, Final Fantasy XV, Monster Hunter: World, Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, The Witcher 3, Metro Exodus and Control. In Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, for example, the RX 6800 hit a low of 42fps in its built-in benchmark versus the 6800 XT’s low of 49fps, while Final Fantasy XV saw the RX 6800 hit lows of 48fps, which is almost 10fps below the RX 6800 XT’s low of 56fps. Indeed, even if you do own a high refresh rate monitor that goes above 60Hz, I'm not sure I'd be able to tell the difference between 80 and 90fps without the aid of a frame rate counter. Again, there are exceptions to this rule. Whereas the 6800 XT can be expected to reach a boost clock of about 2,250MHz (more on third-party cards with OC), the RX 6800 reaches somewhere around about 150MHz less. Of course, that's hardly surprising given how expensive they are, and in most cases the RX … Please enable JavaScript to see comments. As a result, the extra horsepower you get with the RX 6800 XT will help push those minimum frame rates up much closer to a more consistent 60fps, making it much more likely that you’ll be able to carry on playing games at this kind of quality setting in the years to come. If you're aiming to play games at 4K, however, then you're definitely going to get a lot more out of the RX 6800 XT. Die Performance der Radeon RX 6800 (XT) ist katastrophal, sodass selbst eine RX 5700 (XT) in Full HD davonzieht. In the internal duel, the RX 6800 XT clearly surpasses the performance of a Radeon RX 5700 XT. RX 6800 XT. Admittedly, the latter can also still just about hit an average of 60fps in most of my benchmark games on High, but there’s no denying you’ll get smoother overall frame rates by opting for the XT here. However, while the RX 6800 XT is clearly the faster card of the two, I'd probably err on the side of the regular RX 6800 as being the better value card overall. Whack the quality down to Medium, however, and the XT's performance bump starts to become less obvious again. Indeed, until AMD's FidelityFX Super Resolution tech comes out, you shouldn't really be buying either RX 6000 card for 4K gaming at the moment, as their raw performance just can't compete with what you get with Nvidia's RTX cards with DLSS turned on (although again I'll be doing more in-depth benchmark comparisons between AMD and Nvidia's new cards very soon). This review presents a fifteen-game VR performance showdown between the RX 6800 XT and the RTX 3080 using the Vive Pro and FCAT VR.. We have also added Assetto Corsa Competizione and Into the Radius for this review.. However, this situation will likely change once AMD launch their upcoming DLSS competitor tech, FidelityFX Super Resolution – although whether it will be as good at boosting each card’s performance as Nvidia’s DLSS tech remains to be seen. Intel 9600K $210. To help answer that question, I've put together some lovely bar graphs of my 1080p, 1440p and 4K benchmark results, showing you exactly how they stack up across all the major resolutions. Angriff auf den Marktführer: Mit der Radeon RX 6800 XT und RX 6800 attackiert AMD direkt die Geforce RTX 3080 und RTX 3070. Obviously, you won’t have a hard time playing games on either the RX6800 or RX6800 1920 x 1080 For the time being, even the RX 6800 can reach at least 100fps at maximum settings here, while the RX 6800 XT often pushes 120fps. Of course, you could say the same about the RX 6800 XT's speeds on High quality settings, and there is some truth in that. Auf der zweiten Seite unseres Tests der Radeon RX 6700 XT gibt's die Benchmark-Ergebnisse und natürlich auch den GPU-Leistungsindex. On Medium, though, the RX 6800 has more than enough power to hit a consistent 60fps at 4K – although as Control once again proves, there will still be the odd game out there that taxes both cards equally, regardless of quality setting. As a result, the extra horsepower you get with the RX 6800 XT will help push those minimum frame rates up much closer to a more consistent 60fps, making it much more likely that you'll be able to carry on playing games at this kind of quality setting in the years to come. As I mentioned right at the top of this article, I'll be doing a separate ray tracing comparison piece with all of today's next-gen graphics cards very soon, so watch out for that to get a better idea of how things stack up. A comparison between Nvidia’s previous generation flagship, the 2080 Ti, and the 6800-XT shows that AMD now offer comparable raw performance at half the price. Here, the RX 6800 XT managed an average of just 45fps, which is still just about playable, but it’s very much on the borderline of what I’d call an acceptable frame rate. At the moment, the RX 6800 can do ray tracing at 60fps no problem at 1080p, but bump the resolution up to 1440p and you’re looking at frame rates closer to 45fps with the top RT settings enabled. AMD nennt für die Radeon RX 6800 einen Game-Takt von 1.815 MHz und einen maximalen Boost von 2.105 MHz, bei der Radeon RX 6800 XT sind es 2.015 MHz respektive 2.250 MHz. But how do they compare performance-wise and which one should you consider buying when they finally come back in stock? Copyright © 2021 Gamer Network Limited, a ReedPop company. In Final Fantasy XV, I only saw a difference of around 5fps between each card, for example, and Control was even closer at just 3fps. To help answer that question, I’ve put together some lovely bar graphs of my 1080p, 1440p and 4K benchmark results, showing you exactly how they stack up across all the major resolutions. With the exception of Control, the RX 6800 XT delivers speeds well in excess of 60fps here, once again leading by 10-12fps over the RX 6800. It still has around a 10fps lead on its non-XT sibling here, sometimes reaching closer to 15-20fps, but with high refresh rate monitors still being relatively scarce at 4K, you're more likely to hit the 60fps threshold on both cards here, negating that extra lead offered by the XT. Today I want to show you AMD Big Navi Radeon RX 6800 XT 3DMark benchmark scores, that leaked from several sources. Compute performance of Radeon RX 6800 series leaks. When you're dealing with powerful graphics cards like this at 1920x1080, any potential bottlenecks are almost certainly going to be related to your CPU rather than your GPU at this resolution, and it can make a surprising amount of difference to your PC’s overall performance. But what are the property prices like though? VR Wars: The RX 6800 XT vs. the RTX 3080 – 15 Games Performance benchmarked using the Vive Pro. Admittedly, both the RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT are sold out almost everywhere at the moment, making them as difficult to buy as Nvidia's equally new RTX 30 series. At higher resolutions and detail settings, performance can … 6800-XT 3070 2080-Ti. PC Details $1,134 +2%. Many thanks to XFX for the RX 6800 XT Speedster Merc 319 Black sample. Of course, unless you own a high refresh rate monitor, opting for the RX 6800 XT won't get you any benefit at all, as monitors with a standard 60Hz refresh rate will display the same 60fps regardless of which card's inside your PC. AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT im Test: Benchmarks gegen Geforce RTX 3070/3060 (Ti) ... Kommen wir nun zu den Ergebnissen der Radeon RX 6700 XT im Vergleich mit der RX 6800 und drei RTX-30-Grafikkarten. AMD Radeon RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT OpenCL performance. That said, there are a couple of games where the RX 6800 isn’t that far behind the RX 6800 XT. I ran both cards at their default clock speeds as well, so the figures below should be pretty representative of what you'll find on other types of RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT cards made by third party manufacturers. Ultimately, though, I reckon the RX 6800 is the one to try and get out of AMD's new crop of Big Navi cards when it eventually comes back in stock, especially if you're after a top notch 1440p GPU. On Medium, though, the RX 6800 has more than enough power to hit a consistent 60fps at 4K - although as Control once again proves, there will still be the odd game out there that taxes both cards equally, regardless of quality setting. There's no denying the RX 6800 XT has buckets of power at its disposal, but when it comes to overall value, the regular RX 6800 is tough to beat. 01 Dec '20 Driver:20.11.2. Intel 9600K $210. I might just about be able to distinguish between 105fps and close to 130fps in something like The Witcher III, for example, but 80-90fps is all much of a muchness to my eyes. With the exception of Control, the RX 6800 XT delivers speeds well in excess of 60fps here, once again leading by 10-12fps over the RX 6800. Of course, that’s not surprising given how expensive they are. As a result, it may be worth sticking with the regular RX 6800 if you’re planning to play games at 1440p, as I’m not sure you’re really getting one hundred quid’s worth of extra performance here. In truth, you’re probably also better off going with Nvidia’s RTX 3070 instead of the regular RX 6800 for 4K gaming as well, as their respective speeds are both much of a muchness. It offers 50% improvement in terms of performance per watt over its predecessor RDNA 1. AMD’s long-awaited Big Navi GPUs, the Radeon RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT, are finally here. At 1080p and 1440p, I'm just not convinced you're going to notice the extra performance offered by the XT at these resolutions, at least not when it comes to raw performance. The release of the 6000 series explains why Nvidia doubled performance per dollar when they released their 3070 just a few weeks ago. I've also kept ray tracing switched off for this particular comparison test, as I'll be taking a closer look at next-gen ray tracing performance across all of the new AMD and Nvidia GPUs in a dedicated comparison piece. Of course, that's hardly surprising given how expensive they are, and in most cases the RX 6800 XT has a decent lead on its non-XT sibling. Very partial to JRPGs and the fetching of quests. I've also used AMD's versions of the RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT, as these were the cards I used for my respective GPU reviews. Below is the comparison between RX 6800 XT and RTX 3080 graphics cards based on their specifications, performance, pricing, power consumption, and features. I suspect this is likely due to the RX 6800 XT being limited by my CPU in these particular circumstances, as I saw a very similar thing happen with these particular games in my RTX 3060 Ti vs RTX 3070 comparison article as well. Needless to say, ray tracing at 4K is pretty much out of the question on these cards right now, but even if you're just looking to buy a 4K card in general, I'd probably still side with the RX 6800 here, if only because once you start hitting the £600 / $650 mark, you might as well opt for Nvidia's RTX 3080 rather than AMD's RX 6800 XT at this resolution. PCGH testet, wie das ausgeht. Control once again saw a nigh-on identical average frame rate from both cards - although the RX 6800 XT does pull ahead when you switch on the game's ray tracing support. RT graphics performance is an area that AMD cards have been unable to compete, but that all changes with the RDNA2 architecture, the Big Navi cards and specifically the RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT … Overall, then, it's clear that both the RX 6800 and RX 6800 XT are both incredibly powerful graphics cards, capable of filling out high refresh rate monitors at both 1080p and 1440p, and hitting consistent 60fps frame rates on Medium to High settings at 4K. However, as I said above, if playing games as close to 60fps is important to you, then the RX 6800 XT is much more likely to achieve those kinds of frame rates on High than the non-XT version. Admittedly, neither card is really fit for 60fps on max settings at this resolution, as you can see from the bar chart below. In Assassin's Creed Valhalla, for example, the RX 6800 hit a low of 42fps in its built-in benchmark versus the 6800 XT's low of 49fps, while Final Fantasy XV saw the RX 6800 hit lows of 48fps, which is almost 10fps below the RX 6800 XT's low of 56fps. Admittedly, the latter can also still just about hit an average of 60fps in most of my benchmark games on High, but there's no denying you'll get smoother overall frame rates by opting for the XT here. As such, you’ll likely see better performance from the RX 6800 XT at 1080p if you pair it with a more powerful processor, such as one of Intel’s Core i7s or AMD’s Ryzen 7 chips. At the moment, the RX 6800 can do ray tracing at 60fps no problem at 1080p, but bump the resolution up to 1440p and you're looking at frame rates closer to 45fps with the top RT settings enabled. Clearly, neither the RX 6800 or RX 6800 are going to struggle playing games at 1920x1080 for the foreseeable future, as even the RX 6800 is capable of hitting at least 100fps on max settings here, while the RX 6800 XT is often pushing 120fps.

Fertige Ernährungspläne Zum Abnehmen Kostenlos, Beispiel Für Glück Haben, Rbb Livestream Jetzt, Thaddea Graham Größe, Diät Rezepte Ohne Kohlenhydrate Und Zucker, Ingrosso Dolciumi Toscana, Resident Evil 4 Village Chief Height,